I didn't start with AI.
I started in brand marketing — coordinating clients, KOLs, and vendors,
chasing billion-impression metrics that looked great on paper.
But I wanted to make something real, not build my sense of achievement on others' work.
我并非一开始就是AI Native。
最初的兴趣落在品牌营销——如何将好的产品被大家看到是我的目标。
工作中客户、KOL、供应商,各样的声音交织在一起,
一同追逐着那些在报告里闪闪发光的数字。
但我想做点自己的产品,而不是把成就感寄托在他人的作品上。
So I quit and went to grad school.
I wanted to see what happens when you combine communication —
something I'm good at — with the cutting edge of data science and AI.
I absorbed knowledge from every direction: how LLMs shape perception,
how human-AI interaction works, where AI fails in specific contexts,
how the systems we're building actually operate.
于是我辞职,去读研。
我想看看,我擅长的沟通与语言和人文理解,
遇见数据科学和AI这些时代最前沿的技术,会迸发出怎样的火花。
我像海绵一样多维度地吸收着:从最基础的机器学习到晦涩的大模型知识,
理解LLM如何重塑认知、感受人机交互的微妙平衡、研究AI在特定情境下的失灵时刻。
一步步清楚我们正在构建的这些系统和世界的多维,清楚它们真实的运作方式。
But I don't just study — I build.
I get my hands dirty, turning ideas into products based on real insights,
not hype. Leading teams through the messy process of vibe coding
and iteration, shipping features users actually need —
not just features the model can produce.
但我不止于研究——我还要亲手构建。
把想法变成真实的产品,拒绝HYPE,将基于日常洞察去理解、剖析、研究、整理。
带着团队在vibe coding和迭代的混沌中摸索前行,抽丝剥茧。
最重要的是,交付那些用户真正需要的功能——
而不是模型恰好能做出来的功能。
The best AI products are built by people who've seen both sides —
who've written marketing decks and read research papers,
conducted user interviews and debugged AI failures.
You need to understand people and communicate well,
while also understanding the tech deeply enough to know what's possible.
That's the kind of PM I'm becoming.
最好的AI产品,诞生于见过两面的人手中——
写过让人心动的营销文案,做过深入的用户访谈,懂人构建的社会;
啃过晦涩难懂的学术论文,手搓也debug过代码,实践着新技术;
在人文和技术的交织处,学习人与AI的交互,也理解LLM在哪些时刻会悄然失效。
懂人、善于沟通,也要足够深入地理解技术,知道什么是真正可能的。
这,就是我正在成为的那种PM。
"What AI can do and what people actually need — the best products live at that intersection."
"AI能做什么,与人们真正需要什么——最好的产品,就诞生在这个交汇点。"
AI products live or die by iteration speed. I prototype early, test with real users, and kill bad ideas before they become bad features.
我不喜欢在混沌中开始。动手之前,我需要知道终点在哪——功能边界、成功指标、用户拿到这个东西会怎么用。文档不是形式,是我帮自己想清楚的过程。
→ SubSense pivoted from cancel-flow to health-dashboard after first user tests
→ SubSense:PRD和信息架构搭完再进入开发
Dashboards tell you what happened. Great PMs figure out why it happened and what to build next. The best product decisions come from combining data with deep user understanding.
没有一次就对的产品决策。我倾向于早点把东西放到真实用户面前,哪怕它还很粗糙。清楚用户需求,来回获得最真实的反馈去找到真正的需求。
→ At pH7, the real insights came from KOL conversations, not just impression numbers
→ SubSense首次用户测试后,在Setup中加入了偏好与场景问题
You can't slap "trustworthy AI" on a product spec and call it done. Trust is built through consistent behavior, transparent limitations, and accountability when things break.
数字告诉你发生了什么,但不告诉你为什么。真正有用的洞察,发生在数据和人的对话之间。
→ AI Trust Lab taught me: framework thinking bridges research and execution
→ pH7:曝光数据背后,是和KOL一起找到真正有共鸣的内容
Before building an AI product, understand the foundational logic and limits of LLMs — not to avoid risk, but to design for failure moments from day one, rather than waiting for users to discover them for you.
构建AI产品之前,理解LLM的基础逻辑和边界。不是为了规避风险,而是为了在设计上就把这些时刻考虑进去——而不是等用户替你发现。
→ Medical LLM research: edge cases reveal what averages hide
→ 医疗LLM研究:边缘案例才能揭示模型真实的极限
Trust comes from every time the product does what it promised — and from how you handle it when it doesn't.
信任来自每一次它做到了它承诺的事,以及每一次它没做到时你怎么处理。
→ AI Trust Lab: break trust down into something you can measure and improve
→ pH7:AI Trust Lab:把信任拆解成可以测量、可以改进的东西
Here's what I've been building.
Each project lives at the intersection of human behavior and machine intelligence.
这是我正在构建的东西。
每个项目都生长在人类行为与机器智能的交叉地带。
→ CH+ to flip through · POWER to switch off
→ CH+ 切换项目 · POWER 关闭屏幕
I'm a research-informed builder. I spend time in the lab understanding how AI actually works — then I ship products informed by that understanding, not hype.
我是一个基于研究的构建者。我在实验室里花时间理解AI如何真正运作——然后基于这种理解而非炒作来交付产品。
I understand deep, learn quick, and move fast.
理解深入,学习快速,行动迅速。
A future where AI is built by people who ask why,
not just how.
That's the kind of PM I'm becoming.
一个AI产品由懂得追问「为什么」的人来构建的未来,
而不只是追问「怎么做」。
这是我正在成为的那种PM。